2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | RX-8 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
