2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (190 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-8 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |