2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1970 ZIL 114
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 ZIL 114 (254 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2046 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1970 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1970 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Mazda | ZIL |
| Model | RX-8 | 114 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1311 cc | 6998 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 254 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 3175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3770 mm |
