2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1977 Renault 20
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1977 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-8 | 20 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
