2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1978 Seat 127
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1978 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 127.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 127. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1978 Seat 127 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | RX-8 | 127 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 64 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2230 mm |
