2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1979 Audi Fox
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi Fox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi Fox would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 518 kg more than 1979 Audi Fox.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1979 Audi Fox | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | RX-8 | Fox |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1271 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |