2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1981 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1981 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | RX-8 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |
