2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1982 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Westfield ZEI (217 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Westfield ZEI (292 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1982 Westfield ZEI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1982 Westfield ZEI has manual transmission. 1982 Westfield ZEI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1982 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | RX-8 | ZEI |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1311 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2340 mm |