2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1985 Renault 18
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (190 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1985 Renault 18. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 18. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1985 Renault 18. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 18. (163 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1985 Renault 18 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | 18 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |