2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1990 Volvo 960
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1990 Volvo 960. (120 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1990 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 421 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Volvo 960. (143 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Volvo 960.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1990 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-8 | 960 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1311 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |