2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1992 Opel Astra
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Astra would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Opel Astra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1992 Opel Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-8 | Astra |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |