2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1993 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1993 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1993 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | RX-8 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2530 mm |
