2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1995 Nissan 100 NX
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan 100 NX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan 100 NX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan 100 NX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan 100 NX (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan 100 NX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan 100 NX (182 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1995 Nissan 100 NX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1995 Nissan 100 NX | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-8 | 100 NX |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
