2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | RX-8 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |