2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1997 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | RX-8 | SS |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
