2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1997 Rover 414i has manual transmission. 1997 Rover 414i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-8 | 414i |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |