2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-8 | C 52 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2830 mm |