2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | RX-8 | Evanda |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |