2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2006 Mazda RX-8 and 2006 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (190 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-8 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
