2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2008 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (190 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2008 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2008 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
| Model | RX-8 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
