2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (391 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (552 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | RX-8 | Ram |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1311 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 552 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 98 L |