2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2012 Honda Accord

To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.

Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Accord (350 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2012 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: