2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | RX-8 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3302 mm |