2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda Tribute | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Tribute | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2498 cc |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
