2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1972 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1972 Mercury Comet. (82 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mercury Comet weights approximately 410 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mercury Comet. (178 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 1972 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | Tribute | Comet |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2780 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |