2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1977 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1977 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1977 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 540 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 1977 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Tribute | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1981 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |