2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1979 Volvo 260

To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 260 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute. 1979 Volvo 260 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Volvo 260 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: