2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 134 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (262 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Tribute | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 262 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |