2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Saturn SL weights approximately 246 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Saturn SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | Tribute | SL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1901 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |