2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 267 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 825 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute. 2012 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | Tribute | R8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4200 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |