2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Tribute.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: