2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Tribute would be higher.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda Tribute. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Tribute | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Tribute | Leaf |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |