2006 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1913 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lincoln Navigator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute. 2013 Lincoln Navigator has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lincoln Navigator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Mazda | Lincoln |
| Model | Tribute | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5400 cc |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2723 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1988 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 106 L |
