2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | ZAZ |
| Model | C | 966 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
