2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 975 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | C | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2310 mm |