2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (148 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (341 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | C | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 341 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 70.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2440 mm |