2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
| Model | C | Midge |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
