2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. (120 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C.
2006 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | C | FTO |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 69 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |