2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz C | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Acura |
Model | C | TL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2840 mm |