2006 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2011 Mazda 3

To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 3.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mercedes-Benz C 2011 Mazda 3
Make Mercedes-Benz Mazda
Model C 3
Year Released 2006 2011
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2148 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 340 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 55 L