2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CK | RM A |
Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2870 mm |