2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1958 Rover P4
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rover P4 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Rover P4. (153 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1958 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | CK | P4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |