2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1965 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
| Model | CK | MK I |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 846 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2040 mm |
