2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (126 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | CK | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |