2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (96 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | CK | Polo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Top Speed | 270 km/hour | 153 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |