2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1990 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1990 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | CK | Swift |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |