2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CK | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2530 mm |
