2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1998 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi L 200. (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi L 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1998 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CK | L 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2970 mm |