2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota MR2. (183 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | CK | MR2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |