2006 Mercedes-Benz CK vs. 2002 Opel Concept M
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Concept M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Concept M would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Opel Concept M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Concept M. (205 Nm @ 1980 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Concept M.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | 2002 Opel Concept M | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Opel |
Model | CK | Concept M |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1980 RPM |
Top Speed | 270 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 52 L |